首頁 - 范文案例 > Essay代寫范文-UK National Minimum Wage

Essay代寫范文-UK National Minimum Wage

發布于:2020-12-03 作者:yaya 閱讀:755

本文是一篇essay代寫范文,題目為UK National Minimum Wage,本文主要討論了英國國家最低工資水平。全國最低工資(NMW)介紹了在英國1999年的目標,幫助許多低收入工人盡可能無任何重大不良影響通脹或就業。這篇文章將探討最低工資應高于目前的水平£5.80市場競爭作為一種工具使用供求結構。對英國經濟的最低工資的影響將進行調查,并與1999年的最低工資在原來的目標相比。

timg (12).jpg

<标题>The UK National Minimum Wage is currently set at less than 50 per cent of median earnings. Should it be set higher?

英國全國最低工資標準目前不到平均工資的50%。它應該設置更高嗎?

<标题>The National Minimum Wage (NMW) was introduced in the UK in 1999, with the goal of helping “as many low-paid workers as possible without any significant adverse impacts on inflation or employment” (Low Pay Commission, 2006) This essay will explore whether the minimum wage should be higher than its current level of £5.80 using the demand-supply framework in a competitive market as a tool. The impact of the minimum wage on the UK economy will be investigated, and compared against the original goals of the minimum wage back in 1999.

英國于1999年推出了國家最低工資(NMW),目的是幫助“盡可能多的低收入工人,而不會對通貨膨脹或就業造成任何重大不利影響”(低工資委員會,2006年)本文將以競爭市場中的供需框架為工具,探討最低工資是否應高于目前的5.80英鎊水平。我們將調查最低工資對英國經濟的影響,并與1999年最低工資的最初目標進行比較。

The central argument for a NMW is that it protects low paid workers from exploitation. It is “rooted in concern about the ability of markets to provide income equity for the least able members of the work force” (Eatwell et all, 1987). Whilst there is general consensus that socially and morally the NMW is a good thing, the economic benefits versus drawbacks have been vigorously debated for years. The principle argument against is that setting a NMW above the equilibrium point of the demand and supply curves (essential for a NMW to be effective) in a competitive market will cause unemployment through an increase in the supply of labour (because workers are incentivised by higher wages) and decrease in the demand for labour (because firms cannot afford to pay for the same volume of labour as before). One crucial point is that the equilibrium point (and the corresponding supply and demand curves) relates to each worker, and their employability, and therefore there is no one equilibrium point that holds for the market.

NMW的核心論點是它保護低收入工人免受剝削。它“根植于對市場能力為勞動力中能力最弱的成員提供收入公平的能力的擔憂”(Eatwell等人,1987年)。雖然人們普遍認為NMW在社會和道德上是一件好事,但經濟利益與缺點之間的爭論已持續多年。反對的主要論點是,在競爭性市場中,將非關稅壁壘設置在需求和供給曲線的平衡點之上(這對非關稅壁壘的有效性至關重要)將通過增加勞動力供應(因為工人受到更高工資的激勵)和勞動力需求的減少(因為企業無法支付與以前相同數量的勞動力)。一個關鍵點是,均衡點(以及相應的供求曲線)與每個工人及其就業能力有關,因此市場沒有一個平衡點。

<标题>There is no one accepted definition of what low pay is, or indeed what the level of the minimum wage should be. At the upper limit, the Council of Europe defines a so called ‘decency threshold' that originally was 2/3 of the mean wage level (Council of Europe, 2008). This has now been revised down to 60% of net earnings. This would give a NMW in the UK of between £8.17 and £9.00 (40-55% higher than the current £5.80 level). As a result of this up to 38% of full-time workers would have their wages improved (Sloman and Hinde). If the NMW was set at 2/3 of median male earnings rather than mean wages, this would lead to a NMW of £7.50, and positively impact 20% of men and 40% of women. (Sloman and Hinde, 2007)

<标题>Regardless of which measure is chosen to compare the NMW to average (mean, median, full-time male etc), it is clear that the UK NMW is someway off the 60-67% of ‘average' earnings suggested as appropriate. On the flipside, the Low Pay Commission has recommended (and had accepted) above average earnings rises in the minimum wage over the past 10 years (Low Pay Commission, 2009).

A minimum wage acts as a “classical price floor on labour” (Ehrenberg and Smith, 1994). It goes on to explain that “if set above the equilibrium price, more labor will be willing to be provided by workers than will be demanded by employers” The result is “a surplus of the commodity” and this “takes the form of unemployment, which tends to be higher with minimum wage laws than without them” (Sowell, 2007).

It is clear from the above diagram that in a competitive market, setting a minimum wage above the equilibrium rate, leads to deadweight welfare loss. The consumer (employer) surplus must decrease, while producer (employee) surplus may or may not increase; however the decrease in consumer surplus must be greater than the increase in producer surplus

<标题>Back in 1946, Stigler argued (Stigler, 1946) that “a rise in the minimum wage leads perfectly competitive employers to cut employment”. The level of the NMW is not the sole factor determining the size of this employment gap. The elasticity of price for a sectors goods has an impact as well (Sloman and Hinde). Since the NMW applies to the sector as a whole, and not an individual firm, this elasticity effect is attenuated, and the potential unemployment in any one firm minimized. Additional complications such as replacing staff with machines, or overseas threats, serve to ensure that the NMW has the potential to cause unemployment in some sectors prone to these 2 cost reduction techniques.

Under monopsonistic competition, in which the employer has “some influence over rates of pay (Sloman and Hinde), an “appropriately set minimum wage could increase both wages and employment, with the optimal level being equal to the marginal productivity of labor” (Manning, 2003). In this sense, the NMW is seen from the perspective of being a “market regulation policy akin to antitrust policies, as opposed to an illusory "free lunch" for low wage workers” (Manning, 2003) . Dickens et al (Dickens, Machin and Manning, 1999) propose that a modern monopsonistic framework, less based on unrealistic company town concepts, and more on “labor market frictions” could explain the (neoclassically) anomalous neutral/positive employment impacts caused by the introduction of a NMW. They studied the ‘Wage Councils' in the UK, the forerunner to the UK NMW, and found that such firms potentially have a “degree of monopsony power” (Dickens, Machin and Manning, 1999) because those that cut wages “do not instantaneously lose all their workers, so the supply of labor to a firm is not perfectly elastic”. They found that “irrespective of specification and data definition, the effect of minimum wages on employment is always estimated to be nonnegative and in many cases to be positive”. They do add a word of caution, however, that if the NMW was set “high enough”, their theoretical framework could lead to negative results.

Blinder (Blinder, 1996) argues that an increased NMW encourages employees to stay, thus reducing turnover and training costs (associated with new employees). It could also “render moot” (Blinder, 1996) the potential problem of recruiting workers at a higher wage than current workers. He further argues that minimum workers may be such a small part of a businesses cost that it doesn't matter. Whilst these are not proven points, they could explain part of the reason why the NMW has not had a negative impact on the UK economy as a whole.

Contrary to initial concern, and possibly as a result of the deliberately cautious (Low Pay Commission, 2009) initial £3.60 rate; there has been little evidence that the NMW has had a negative economic impact. Research by the Low Pay Commission has found that employers may have “reduced their rate of hiring, reduced staff hours, increased prices, and have found ways to cause current workers to be more productive (especially service companies)” (Low Pay Commission, 2005)

<标题>Research in the US by Card and Krueger (Card and Krueger, 1994) (Card and Krueger, 1995) showed that increases in the minimum wage actually increased employment. This result was supported by Krugman (Krugman, 2007) and Stiglitz (Stiglitz, 2002), but vehemently opposed by Murphy, Mankiv (Mankiw, 1999) and Becker (Becker, 1995).

<标题>In the UK, Machin et al (Machin, Manning and Rahman, 2003) demonstrated that the “current evidence on the employment effects of the National Minimum Wage suggests that these effects (employment and hours reduction) have been small or non-existent, whilst Stewart (Stewart, 2004) showed “there to have been no reduction in the employment probabilities of minimum wage workers as compared to workers slightly higher up the wage distribution”.

The Low Pay Commission in their 2009 commission report (Low Pay Commission, 2009) assert that the NMW continues to exert “significant influence on wages at the bottom of the earnings distribution” whilst “firms appear to have adapted to these increases in wage costs by changing pay structures, removing wage premia, and reducing non-wage costs” This would suggest that the NMW is achieving its goals of benefiting low paid workers, whilst having a “benign influence on the economy” (Low Pay Commission, 2009)

The efficiency hypothesis states that “the productivity of workers rise as the wage rates rise” (Sloman and Hinde, 2007) Therefore the introduction of a NMW should improve workers, and firms, productivity. However, however empirical studies in the UK (Low Pay Commission, 2009) have found no evidence for this to be true.

Draca et al (Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005) showed that wage increases were not passed onto consumers as price increases, and therefore profitability was “significantly” affected by the introduction of the NMW in the UK. They also observed, however, that few firms had gone out of business, and suggested that the effect of the NMW was to ‘moderate these excess profits by channeling them back to the wages of low paid workers'(Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005)

Since the introduction of the minimum wage in the UK in 1999, the level has risen against median earnings year on year. The low pay commission has sought to exhibit a “cautious approach” (Low Pay Commission, 2009) during times of uncertainty, whilst increasing it faster than the average wage during economically stable periods, and thus improving the “effective level of the minimum wage” (Low Pay Commission, 2009). Studies on the impact of the NMW, both in the UK (Machin, Manning and Rahman, 2003) (Stewart, 2004), and the US (Card and Krueger, 1994) (Card and Krueger, 1995) have shown neutral to positive employment probability impacts of the NMW, negligible consumer product prices rises with a reduction in firm profitability (Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005). At the same time, a significant number of workers have benefitted (Low Pay Commission, 2009) (Dickens and Manning, 2004). However, this picture must be considered against the backdrop of a buoyant economy and increasing labour market flexibility between 1999 and 2007 (Sloman and Hinde). Since 2007 there has been “relative economic uncertainty” (Low Pay Commission, 2009), and the Low Pay Commission has recommended a more “modest increase” (Low Pay Commission, 2009) this year of 7 pence taking the adult NMW to £5.80. In light of the data showing a year on year fall in aggregate employment in 2008 (Low Pay Commission, 2009), combined with studies showing that whilst small rises in NMW appear to have a relatively benign economic impact (Stewart, 2004), increasing the NMW outside its “range of indeterminacy (Sloman and Hinde, 2007) to the levels suggested by the Council of Europe (Council of Europe, 2008) , may well lead to the negative employment and inflation impacts predicted in the literature (Mankiw, 1999) (Becker, 1995). An increase in the NMW is, therefore, currently not recommended.

<标题>References 參考文獻

(Becker, 1995) Becker "IT'S SIMPLE: HIKE THE MINIMUM WAGE, AND YOU PUT PEOPLE OUT OF WORK BusinessWeek.

(Blinder, 1996) Alan S. Blinder, "The $5.15 Question," The New York Times, 23 May 1996, p. A29.

(Card and Krueger, 1994) David Card and Alan B. Krueger, "Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the FastFood Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania," American Economic Review, Volume 84, no. 4 (September 1994), pp. 774775.

<标题>(Card and Krueger, 1995) Card, D. and Krueger, A. 1995 Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

<标题>(Council of Europe, 2008) Council of Europe, DIGEST OF THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF SOCIAL RIGHTS, 1st Sept 2008

<标题>(Dickens and Manning, 2004) Dickens, R. and A. Manning (2004) "Spikes and Spill-overs: The Impact of the National Minimum Wage on the Wage Distribution in a Low-Wage Sector", Economic Journal. Vol. 114, No. 49.

(Dickens, Machin and Manning, 1999) Dickens, Richard, Stephen Machin and Alan Manning (1999): "The Effects of Minimum Wages on Employment: Theory and Evidence from Britain", Journal of Labor Economics, 17(1), 1-22.

(Draca, Machin and Reenen, 2005) Draca, Mirko, Stephen Machin and John Van Reenen (2005): "The Impact of the National Minimum Wage on Profits and Prices: Report for Low Pay Commission", February.

(Eatwell et all, 1987) Eatwell, John, Ed.; Murray Milgate, Peter Newman (1987). The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: The Macmillan Press Limited. pp. 476-478. ISBN 0333372352

<标题>(Ehrenberg and Smith, 1994) Ehrenberg, R. and Smith, R. "Modern labor economics: theory and public policy", HarperCollins, 1994, 5th ed.

(Krugman, 2007) Paul Krugman, The conscience of a liberal (W.W. Norton & Co., 2007)

<标题>(Low Pay Commission, 2005) Low Pay Commission (2005). National Minimum Wage Low Pay Commission Report 2005

(Low Pay Commission, 2006) - From Low Pay Commission

(Low Pay Commission, 2009) National Minimum Wage - Low Pay Commission Report 2009

(Machin, Manning and Rahman, 2003) Stephen Machin; Alan Manning; Lupin Rahman, "Where the Minimum Wage Bites Hard: Introduction of Minimum Wages to a Low Wage Sector "Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Mar., 2003), pp. 154-180

(Mankiw, 1999) Mankiw

(Manning, 2003) Manning, Alan (2003). Monopsony in motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691113122

(Mason, 2009) Adapted from Robin Masons BEMM734 Lecture notes

(Sloman and Hinde, 2007) Sloman, John and Kevin Hinde, Economics for Business, ISBN 0273709089. p382-384

<标题>(Sowell, 2007) Sowell, Thomas (20070402). Basic Economics (3rd Edition): A Common Sense Guide to the Economy

(Stewart, 2004) Stewart, Mark (2004) 'The Impact of the Introduction of the UK Minimum Wage on the Employment Probabilities of Low Wage Workers', Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 67-97.

(Stigler, 1946) Stigler, G. 1946. The economics of minimum wage legislation. American Economic Review 36: 358-365.

(Stiglitz, 2002) Joseph Stiglitz. Employment, social justice and societal wellbeing , International Labour Review, 141 (12), p. 929.

以上就是Essay代寫范文全部內容,歡迎閱讀,范文內容和格式僅供留學生參考學習,不得抄襲,如有Essay代寫需要,請聯系網站客服。

二維碼

掃一掃關注我們

版權聲明:<标题>本站文章來源為原創以及網絡整理,意在為留學生分享各種留學論文寫作技巧以能夠順利完成學業,論文寫作格式以及范文僅供學習參考。如本站文章和轉稿涉及版權等問題,請及時聯系本站,我站將在第一時間予以刪除。

相關文章

  • Essay代寫被抓的主要緣故及解決方案有哪些?

    Essay代寫被抓的主要緣故及解決方案有哪些?

    盡管代寫是海外學生“善假于物”的明智行為,可是“東窗事發”的情況會導致非常令人糟心的結果,目前大多數學校都明確禁止學生找代寫服務。考慮到現在學生們都很小心且機敏...

    2021-06-16

  • 如何找到靠譜的網課托管?

    如何找到靠譜的網課托管?

    很多留學生在尋找網課托管時,通常只會通過瀏覽器搜索關鍵詞,然后尋找排名靠前的機構。在他們看來,排名靠前的一定是最好的,不會上當受騙。盡管這樣的托管機構的確比微信...

    2021-06-11

  • 找留學作業代寫需承擔一定的風險

    找留學作業代寫需承擔一定的風險

    <标题> 留學作業代寫在留學圈中已經屢見不鮮了,無論是國內還是國外代寫都各自有著自己的運營體系,但無論是哪一種代寫,同學們都將會承擔一定的風險。那么,具體是怎樣的風險呢?...

    2021-06-09

  • Academic Writing的定義及其特性

    Academic Writing的定義及其特性

    西方學術寫作(Academic Writing)在一些中國同學們看來仿佛是一種高大上的形式。它們嚴謹,規矩并且職業。在精美的封面包裹下,藏著一份對于一項自我研究...

    2021-06-08

  • Capstone Project寫作步驟分享

    Capstone Project寫作步驟分享

    <标题> Capstone Project Writing是學生需要完成的學習任務;可幫助學生學習如何查找和分析信息以及如何有效地使用信息。那么留學生怎樣才能高質量的完成...

    2021-06-06

  • 一份完整的初稿可提升文書撰寫效率

    一份完整的初稿可提升文書撰寫效率

    所謂好的開始是成功的一半,撰寫一份內容相對完整的初稿能夠讓你避免重寫,并在后續的留學文書寫作過程更加有效率。那么,如何判斷你的留學文書是否需要重寫:http:/...

    2021-06-02

發表評論

在線客服

售前咨詢
售后咨詢
微信號
Badgeniuscs
微信